Opinion from OU Senior Associate Athletics Director for Communications Kenny Mossman.
Three teams tied for the Big 12
South Division Championship in 2008. Shiny, new trophies
now reside in Norman, Austin and Lubbock. Lubbock?
Yes Lubbock, where Texas Tech claims just as much of
the crown as Oklahoma and Texas. All are 7-1.
You remember Texas Tech. After 10 games and back-to-back
wins over Oklahoma State and Texas, the Red Raiders
were 10-0 and ranked No. 2 in the nation. The college
football world was all awash with Tech's high-powered
offense and obviously improved defense, and for good
reason.
Then OU happened. Tech ran into a buzz saw on Owen
Field and lost by 44 points. Mike Leach's program went
from belle of the ball to the alternate at an eight-year-old's
birthday party. Talk of Tech vanished faster than Michael
Crabtree's short jaunt into the end zone, and the reasons
for that aren't pretty.
Yet call up Big12Sports.com and there Tech remains,
tied atop the Big 12 South and part of this triangle
that has everybody's diastolic number well north of
100. PR campaigns aside, Tech is and must be part of
the discussion. Tech is just as tied as Oklahoma and
Texas.
Ties in sports were made to be broken, NFL games
and at least one past MLB All-Star game notwithstanding.
When available, the best way to break ties is through
head to head match-ups although a quick look through
the NCAA basketball bracket will reveal teams in the
tourney that were beaten by teams that were left out.
Still, head-to-head works pretty well until three teams
tie, and each of the teams can claim a victory over
one of the other three, but not both.
So here we sit, trying to find a South team to go
to Kansas City for the Big 12 title game, and staring
squarely into the eyes of the Bowl Championship Series
(BCS). Let's talk about the BCS as a tie-breaker.
You can hate the BCS if you choose and Lord knows
a lot of people do. But the fact remains that the BCS
is the system we use to determine the participants
for the national championship game and the most lucrative
bowls.
When each college football season commences, the
six BCS conferences have two clearly defined goals:
1) Get two teams into BCS games and, 2) Get one of
the teams into the national championship game.
And that is why the Big 12 Conference implemented
a tie-breaker plank that includes the BCS. Some want
to argue that it doesn't belong, but like most arguments
against the BCS or even a playoff, it is impossible
to look at the circumstances in any one particular
year, and think that a remedy for this season would
necessarily work in subsequent years. Here's why.
Let's say that OU, UT and TTU all were tied just
as they are now, but that instead of OU and UT holding
down the Nos. 2 and 3 spots in the BCS they held down
Nos. 2 and 4, respectively, with USC sitting at No.
3.
Now, if you're the Big 12 and you're in that scenario,
which tie-breaker makes the most sense? Do you want
to dislodge Oklahoma and forfeit a potential spot in
the national title game? Of course not.
But ignoring precedent we're now getting a plethora
of other tie-breaking suggestions, including one that
recommends a point differential. For Heaven's sake,
in the attempt to perfect a system let's not forfeit
sportsmanship.
Remember the fallout from Oklahoma's 77-0 win a
few years ago. What if that score had been 90-0 in
the interest of breaking a tie? Think for a moment
about the ugliness of a road team, already up by four
or five touchdowns, punching in another as time expires.
And what about teams that win with defense rather
than a high-powered offense. Is 60-20 more valuable
than 35-0? I guess a point differential could be capped
ala the NFL, but in college ball would that really
solve anything?
Question the BCS all you want, but as long as the
BCS is here, you can't question tie-breakers that are
pointed in that direction.
Now, what you can question is how we all carry ourselves. When one team goes to a rival's stadium
to face a rival that is unbeaten at home and ranked
No. 11/12 nationally, and wins by 20 points, then falls
in the human polls, the human element has taken a turn
that raises a lot of questions.
Tell you what, get on Google and find me the instances
in which a ranked team has beaten another ranked team
under those same circumstances and then dropped in
the polls. It's not unprecedented but it is rare on
rare.
Bottom line is this ... three teams tied for
the Big 12 South championship. Three. That tie is being
broken in a manner that best maximizes a system, whether
it's flawed or not, that determines college football's
highest honor.
Here's to hoping that the process can play out with
professionalism and the high road still intact.

Read
an inside perspective from the OU
Athletics Department on the latest Sooner sports topics.
Senior Associate Athletics Director for Communications
Kenny
Mossman provides his thoughts in his online column
at SoonerSports.com.